People have different opinions. Now, interesting as this may be, learning how to determine the fact that certain convictions are actually ‘more relevant’, no discussion will ever have to be wearisome and pointless. – Relevant, that is, in the sense that ‘it has its base in reality’, i.e. ‘holds (more) truth’.
There are truths to be known about the world we live in, and since our opinions relate to that world, a number of convictions can correctly be labelled ‘irrelevant’ since they are not based in reality i.e. not related to a verifiable truth in any way.
Opinions and Issues
Opinions can relate to issues i.e. a topic which can be approached from different angles.
Concerning one particular issue: One can either do something or nothing.
There probably is an infinite amount of something.
There probably is only one kind of nothing.
There could be no such thing as nothing.
Human Well-Being and Problems
Human well-being concerns objectifiable effects on consciousness.
A phenomenon which negatively impacts the standard of human well-being is a problem.
By default, a phenomenon which does not negatively impact the standard of human well-being is not a problem.
It is true to say there are issues in society which can be identified as problems.
By default, it is true to say that some issues cannot be identified as problems.
The severity and number in which problems exist in society effect the total amount of human well-being and happiness in that society.
Problems and Solutions
It is true to say that actual problems may be assigned different solutions which realise varying degrees of human well-being and happiness.
It is probably true to say that here are an infinite number of ways to solve a problem.
There are solutions to problems which realise a greater amount of human well-being and happiness than other solutions.
There are solutions to problems which are more relevant than others.
Problems and Priorities
Actual problems have a degree of priority i.e. one problem is more relevant than another.
The degree of priority of a problem is determined by the quantity of verifiable negative impact on human well-being.
It is empirically true to say that one problem is more conducive to degrading human well-being than a another.
The rate or amount of degradation with regard to human well-being is known as the scale of the problem.
The scale of the problem determines its priority.
Different priorities are assigned to a problem; these priorities can be misplaced in relation to the scale of the problem i.e. erroneous.
Worse still, certain priorities are assigned to issues that are not actual problems. These priorities are erroneous.
Good post. There are many untruths being spread in our world today and I’ll admit I’ve gotten stuck in the rabbit hole of trying to debate them. It’s like banging your head against the wall, ouch.